Affordable Housing Solutions for Florida
Legal name: Affordable Housing Solutions For
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 650406381
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Land Olakes, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3058654555
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,115,242
- Expenses
- $1,790,475
- Assets
- $14,312,922
- Liabilities
- $15,749,076
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBRA FLEMING (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- JACQUELINE MCPHILLIPS (DIRECTOR/VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DEBRA FLEMING (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR): $96,923 total reported compensation
- JACQUELINE MCPHILLIPS (DIRECTOR/VICE PRESIDENT): $14,856 total reported compensation
- PEDRO VERMALES (DIRECTOR/SECRETARY/TREASUR): $9,865 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New Look, New Feel, Same Great Mission Affordable Housing Solutions Florida (AHSF) is a non profit developer, owner and service provider to over 4500 affordable housing units in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, and Texas. Our mission is to create and preserve quality healthy living for everyone. In order to better serve the great communities throughout the United States with affordable housing needs, we have undergone a complete re-branding of our organization to reflect our desire to be able to maintain connectivity with those that we serve. As you visit through our website, you will find several opportunities in which you can connect with us through traditional methods such as posta.
What it reported doing in 2024
Affordable housing solutions for Florida (ahsf) is a not-for-profit affordable housing developer. Ahsf serves as an integral part of the process of developing multifamily affordable housing for low income, homeless, elderly and disabled adults and families in Florida and the southeastern united states.ahsf continues to maintain its other properties it has helped develop and searches for developable land or sites for the preservation of affordable housing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some related-organization disclosures are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -60.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.99; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.1; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.