Affordable Housing Association of Arkansas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581824749
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Siloam Springs, AR, USA
Phone
4795247791
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$148,896
Expenses
$133,469
Assets
$243,764
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATY BLEVINS (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY KLEINHENZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • THOM EMBACH (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KATY BLEVINS (PRESIDENT)
  • CASEY KLEINHENZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • THOM EMBACH (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Information sharing about the rental housing market is the primary purpose. This is accomplished by communicating by email and meetings about new developments in the industry and providing updated lease forms for use in rentals. The association also sponsors an annual convention for information sharing and provides speakers to update members about new issues in the industry. Costs were $87,015.

What it reported doing in 2025

Providing infomation to members and lease forms updated. Service to 100. Convention is held annually providing updates on industry issues. Costs $86,281.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.7%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 65.2%; rating input score 65

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.83; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.7% of revenue deployed · 65.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.