Affinity Health and Medical Systems

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510396018
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2013
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Claymont, DE, USA
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$902,325
Expenses
$961,255
Assets
$218,194
Liabilities
$49,453

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALTON DAMION WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
  • SHANE LEWIS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • R DANDRIDGE COLLINS PHD (VICE-PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALTON DAMION WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT): $109,287 total reported compensation
  • R DANDRIDGE COLLINS PHD (VICE-PRESIDENT): $84,000 total reported compensation
  • SHANE LEWIS (VICE-PRESIDENT): $79,649 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide health and medical services to the at-risk, underserved and the uninsured by establishing wellness centers located in local charter schools.

What it reported doing in 2013

Services were provided to many students/scholars that do not normally have access to vision services due to geographic proximity and limited transportation option. Group counseling sessions were provided focusing on trauma, grief/loss, suicide prevention, anti-bullying and pro-social skills. Many of the students/scholars come from adverse home environments that are not conducive to following up on necessary physical health appointments. The program provides for follow-up care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 36%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 40.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $801K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $109K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.