Aesthetic Group Gymnastics Federation of the USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825104537
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2392871460
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $189,654
- Expenses
- $187,095
- Assets
- $24,284
- Liabilities
- $19,878
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELENA BALTOVICK (President)
- BB IGNATOVA (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- ELENA BALTOVICK (President)
- BB IGNATOVA (Vice President)
- NICOLE AZIMIOARA (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and expand Aesthetic Group Gymnastics by organizing competitions, providing services to clubs and teams, supporting teams and individual athletes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Organized 4 National competitions, with 32 US teams involved. Organized and facilitated participation of 9 US teams in the International World Championships and a World Cup; provided 2 training courses for 20 coaches.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 70%; rating input score 70; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $184K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.