Aeromedical Community Emergency Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471577788
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Dana Point, CA, USA
Phone
9498133837
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,800
Expenses
$800
Assets
$32,000
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD CASO (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD CASO (CEO)
  • MARY BRANNIGAN (SECRETARY)
  • SCOTT RADLEY (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help fill a need to resupply hospitals and other emergency health care facilities in the crucial 48-72 hours following a natural or manmade disaster. This organization will remain available to assist governmental agencies if requested to do so. Aeromedical community emergency services will provide air transportation of vital medical supplies to hospitals and emergency evacuation centers in times of major natural or manmade disasters. Based on key airports, aeromedical emergency community services volunteer pilots and aircrafts will coordinate services with red cross, county disaster management agencies, salvation army, and other charitable agencies. In short, we will have the ability to fly critical medical supplies to where they are needed on a timely basis.

What it reported doing in 2016

Program that is designed to ensure that hospitals will come to each other's aid if they are running short of supplies because of a medical surge of unexpected emergency cases due to a major natural or manmade disaster.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 97.6%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 40; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.