Aero Club of New England

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042743144
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bedford, MA, USA
Phone
9782430844
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$234,607
Expenses
$131,144
Assets
$1,213,354
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID O'LEARY (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DAN SCHRAGER (DIRECTOR)
  • KEITH LEONHARDT (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
  • JOHN GODFREY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide scholarships to men and women entering aviation careers; and to provide aviation safety seminars

What it reported doing in 2024

The aero club of new england (acone) is a club that focuses on aviation safety seminars, aviation scholarships, and flight training while sharing the social aspect with those who have a passion for flight. Members include active pilots, former pilots, and non-pilots who love to learn more about aviation.our ranks range from the obscure to the legendary. Many past and present members have significantly contributed to aviation and are considered new england's aviation legends.the godfrey l. Cabot award, established in 1952, honors and perpetuates the name of one of the founders and long-term presidents of the aero club. Cabot award recipients will be individuals or teams who were the first in their field and who changed the course of aviation and/or history as inventors of types of aircraft, propulsion systems, or significant aviation technology; who have conducted significant "first flights or pioneered significant new routes inflight or into space; or were pioneers or inventors in aviation training or tactics.the aero club's scholarship program awards dozens of scholarships worth 10s of thousands of dollars annually. The aero club has awarded over $700,000 in scholarships to nearly 450 women, men, and students. Our scholarships are for pilot training, as well as for students interested in maintenance technologies for aircraft and powerplants, and aviation management. Member donations and scholarship fundraisers help fund the scholarships. Many of our scholarship winners have gone on to help grow the aviation industry by being hired by airlines and private aviation companies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 52% for direct work, and 48% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $40.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 44.1%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.25; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.