Aerial Recovery
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824664854
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6153729775
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,380,680
- Expenses
- $4,028,447
- Assets
- $2,969,229
- Liabilities
- $215,509
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRITNIE TURNER (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- JEREMY LOCKE (VICE PRESIDENT/COO)
Highest reported compensation
- JEREMY LOCKE (VICE PRESIDENT/COO): $38,846 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. Through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who, through their own experiences and healing, are equipped to serve others on a global scale across disaster relief, anti-human trafficking, animal rescue, and humanitarian missions worldwide.
What it reported doing in 2024
Heal the heroes is aerial recovery's foundational program and the engine that powers every mission. The program addresses a documented national crisis: more than 6,200 u.s. Veterans take their own lives each year (one every 84 minutes). The primary drivers include the loss of mission, community, and purpose that follows separation from service. Heal the heroes confronts these drivers directly by replacing them with something real: a new mission, a new team, and a new calling.the heal the heroes program is available to veterans and first responders, whether already serving on aerial recovery's teams or newly identified through field recruitment, community outreach, or partner referrals. Participation is not a prerequisite for joining aerial recovery's teams; it is a resource actively made available to eligible team members, and a pipeline through which many operators are developed. Aerial recovery also provides mental health support, resilience resources, and peer care to team members who do not meet the veteran or first responder criteria but who serve in demanding operational environments.the program operates through aerial recovery's five-phase impact engine: recruit: veterans and first responders seeking renewed purpose are identified and invited through field operations, partner referrals, and community outreach.retrain: participants undergo structured, trauma-informed programming that rebuilds discipline, trusted community, and mission-readiness. Non-veteran team members receive parallel preparation appropriate to their role.repurpose: skills from military, emergency service, or civilian backgrounds are redirected into humanitarian operations, including specialized tracks such as animal rescue and equine therapy at redemption ranch.rescue: participants and trained operators deploy globally to conduct disaster relief, anti-human trafficking operations, and animal rescue missions.recover: operators receive trauma-informed resilience and recovery care post-deployment. Survivors receive support, communities rebuild, and new candidates are identified to restart the cycle.investment in operator recruitment, training, restoration, and readiness is direct program expenditure, not administrative overhead. The operators who deliver every mission are heal the heroes participants and mission-qualified civilians built with this same integrated system in mind. There is no program delivery without the people this program builds.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.5%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.1%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 44.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.5% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $39K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.