Aeras

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522044704
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019
Location
Germantown, MD, USA
Phone
3015472900
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$873,999
Expenses
$1,923,463
Assets
$3,261,871
Liabilities
$31,226

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACQUELINE SHEA (CEO)
  • JENNIFER WELGOS (INTERIM CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JACQUELINE SHEA (CEO): $498,455 total reported compensation
  • DONNA D'AMATO (CONTROLLER): $263,008 total reported compensation
  • JACQUELINE SHEPPARD (ASSOC DIR, PAYROLL & BENEFITS): $262,008 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Aeras is a non-profit product development organization dedicated to the development of effective tuberculosis (tb) vaccines and biologics to prevent tb across all age groups in an affordable and sustainable manner. Aeras utilizes its broad capabilities and technologies in collaboration with numerous partners and stakeholders to support the development of vaccines and other biopharmaceuticals to address tb and other significant public health needs of underserved populations. In the pursuit of our mission, we are guided by our core values. These core values express our aspirations and the behaviors we want to exhibit and model. They shape the culture and character of aeras and inform all of our decisions and actions.

What it reported doing in 2019

Support to preclinical, clinical and research efforts to help raise awareness and support tb vaccines.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - Most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 58
  • Accountability: 62
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.8%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 4%; rating input score 4
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -120.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 69.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -23.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.8% of revenue deployed · 4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 2 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $498K · 7 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $165K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.