Advanced Technical Intelligence Center for Human Capital Development

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208200698
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Fairborn, OH, USA
Phone
9377757625
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Brain Disorders

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,626,030
Expenses
$3,073,549
Assets
$8,801,085
Liabilities
$7,088,903

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CASSIE BARLOW PHD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • HUGH BOLTON (TRUSTEE:): $49,300 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop the advanced technical intelligence workforce of the future by providing training and education to all.

What it reported doing in 2015

To facilitate the training, education and certification of qualified people to create a workforce that can develop, acquire, sustain, manage and employ advanced, sophisticated technical intelligence systems and techniques for the entire technical intelligence community by making their state-of-the-art secure facility available to other organizations for meetings and conferences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 40
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.2%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 26%; rating input score 26
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -89%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.86; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.2% of revenue deployed · 26% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $800K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $49K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.