Advance Columbus and West Georgia Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880719883
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7063271566
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,700
- Expenses
- $145,700
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JERALD MITCHELL (PRESIDENT)
- WILL BURGIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JERALD MITCHELL (PRESIDENT)
- WILL BURGIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOE SANDERS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advance columbus and west Georgia, inc. Was created to promote the social welfare of georgians by supporting policies that support economic growth and expand opportunities for georgians.
What it reported doing in 2022
Advance columbus and west Georgia, inc. Invested in an outreach campaign through mail, phone and text to encourage residents of columbus, ga in muscogee county and surrounding counties to vote to keep the tsplost tax for the purpose of improving existing infrastructure in and around the city, and to support the development of additional projects, including local road repair and improvement and the purchase of transportation equipment. With the renewal of the tsplost, the Georgia dept. Of transportation (gdot)committed to provide $38 million for new tia projects. The funding will also allow columbus to use matching funds for newly approved gdot grants, and free up general funds for other city needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $146K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.