Adoption Planning Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581916251
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4042489105
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,447
Expenses
$33,354
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Rhonda Fishbein (Executive Direc)
  • Arnold F Ernst (Secretary)
  • Kimberly Bonde (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized to provide services to prospective adoptive parents, adoptive children and biological parents considering adoption.

What it reported doing in 2013

The corporation, established January 1990, is organized to provide services to prospective adoptive parents, adoptive children and biological parents considering adoption. When contacted by prospective adoptive parents, Adoption Planning provides education about adoption and supplies information and application forms. Having reviewed the information, the adoptive parents complete the forms and the agency helps them to reach their goal of adoption.If the adoptive parents wish to adopt internationally, Adoption Planning educates the families about the process, the risks, the cost, the possible delays and assists them with the preparation of the required home study. When contacted by a birth parent, the agency will meet with her, discuss her options, provide counseling and help her find a family with whom to place her baby. Counseling services continue after the placement if the birth parents wish to meet with the counselor.This agency cooperates with agencies throughout the country. It is a private agency receiving no grants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 86%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -73.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 86% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.