Adopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592471253
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lake Worth, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5612531361
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,196,981
- Expenses
- $10,622,617
- Assets
- $17,040,107
- Liabilities
- $875,019
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Matthew Constantine (Chief Executive Officer)
Highest reported compensation
- Matthew Constantine (Chief Executive Officer): $199,502 total reported compensation
- Arianna DeLeo (Chief Financial Officer): $72,275 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To strengthen families with children in their efforts to achieve stability and self-sufficiency by providing access to all encompassing services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Senator Philip D. Lewis Homeless Resource Center (HRC)The Organization is a partner agency of Palm Beach County's Homeless Resource Center (HRC), which opened in 2012. The HRC serves as Palm Beach County's "front door" for access to homeless services. The Organization operates the family division and provides homeless families with assessments, case management, access to mainstream resources, vital shelter and housing services, and permanent housing. The HRC family division receives funding from multiple sources, including Palm Beach County, HUD, private foundations, and partnering agencies. Over 7499 calls were received by the HRC family division resulting in 2259 individuals, of whom, (Continues on Schedule O) 873 were adults and 1386 were children, receiving services during the fiscal year. 84% of families who were housed by the HRC maintained stable housing after one year as evidenced by not re-entering the homeless system.Connecting Youth to Opportunities (CYTO)CYTO is a Rapid Re-Housing program for families experiencing homelessness, whose head of household must be 18 to 24 years old at program entry. The program is one of the HUD-funded programs administered out of the HRC. The program offers intensive case management and supportive services to all residents, as well as a declining rental subsidy to assist clients while they work toward being able to sustain their housing costs independently. A total of 25 families, or 64 individuals, received services and 60% of the families participating in the program increased or maintained their income during the fiscal year.Connecting Youth to Opportunities 2 (CYTO 2)CYTO 2 is a Rapid Re-Housing program for families experiencing homelessness, whose head of household must be 18 to 24 years old at program entry. The program is one of the HUD-funded programs and is administered out of the HRC. The program offers intensive case management and supportive services to all participants, as well as a declining rental subsidy to assist clients while they work toward being able to sustain their housing costs independently. A total of 27 families, or 75 individuals, received services and 78% of the families participating in the program increased or maintained their income during the fiscal year.Youth Establishing Stability (YES)YES is a Permanent Supportive Housing program for families experiencing homelessness, whose head of household must be 18 to 24 years old at program entry and must have a disability of long duration. This is one of the HUD-funded programs administered out of the HRC. The program offers intensive case management and supportive services to all 40 individuals. 82% of participating families remained stably housed during the fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 86.1%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 86.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 13 filed program accomplishments · $9.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $200K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.