Addys Hope Social Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201760379
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Midland, TX, USA
Phone
4328971503
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adoption
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$619,523
Expenses
$567,781
Assets
$899,611
Liabilities
$699,334

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN PETREE (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • HOLLYANN PETREE (Executive Dir.): $96,149 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A non-profit child placing agency licensed by the state of Texas dedicated to uniting Christian families with the children who need them.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the organization operated the following programs: Beauty from Ashes-our traditional infant adoption program. Services provided include: support of birth mothers, adoption planning, training, home study services, placement, and monitoring of the placement. Our case managers are available to both the birth mother as well as the adoptive family from the time of match until services are no longer needed, including after the child is placed.They Wait-our child waiting program in which children in the custody of Texas DFPS and are legally free for adoption are placed into adoptive homes. The services provided to the families include: recruitment and training of adoptive parents, home study services, child matching, placement monitoring, and support to children and families through the entire process.Sustaining Hope-our post-adopt program that support any of our agencys families who have completed an adoption. Services include crisis intervention, behavioral intervention, help with locating facilities and providers for needed services, as well as family preservation support. As an agency we have worked with over 100 families and all post-adopt services are available to each of them.Future Hope-our program for young men who are aging out of foster care. Future Hope serves young men 18-22 transitioning to success in life from the foster care system by: providing a furnished studio apartment, equipping them with life skills, supporting them through relationships, and linking them to education, mentors, and community partners. This program includes Hope Crossing, a 14 unit apartment complex built on our property. Young men who are part of this program will lie at Hope Crossing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.3%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.78; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.3% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $411K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.