Adapt Integrated Health Care
Legal name: Adapt
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930611783
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Roseburg, OR, USA
- Phone
- (541) 672-2691
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $69,074,170
- Expenses
- $68,863,594
- Assets
- $112,554,392
- Liabilities
- $36,131,235
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGORY S BRIGHAM PHD (CEO)
- STEPHEN BARON (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GREGORY S BRIGHAM PHD (CEO): $716,251 total reported compensation
- STEVEN JEFFERS (MD): $376,062 total reported compensation
- TISHA LARSEN (PSYCHIATRIC NURSE PRACTITI): $325,346 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide our communities access to world-class primary care, addictions treatment, behavioral health care and prevention services to promote health and restore lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Out of scope behavioral health servicesoutpatient services: evaluation, treatment, opioid treatment program, transitional housing, education, referral and emergency services to individuals and families with drug, alcohol and related problems.residential treatment (adult and youth): operation of a 21 bed adult alcohol and drug treatment facility serving thirteen counties, a 12 bed youth alcohol and drug treatment facility serving six counties in southwest Oregon, and an 11 bed sub-acute
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.6%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 9 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 78.6% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $54.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $716K · 17 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.