Adams Gladwell Durham Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814716154
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Holladay, UT, USA
Phone
8012627447
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$106,742
Expenses
$300
Assets
$309,410

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NATHAN ADAMS (PRESIDENT &)

People named in this filing

  • NATHAN ADAMS (PRESIDENT &)
  • MICHAEL A GLADWELL (VICE PRESIDE)
  • MARK DURHAM (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the organization is to improve knowledge, patient care and techniques in the oral and maxillofacial surgery sphere. Few charitable organizations exist within the intersecting medical and dental realm of oral and maxillofacial surgery, creating a void and need. Through outcomes-based research and education, the organization shall seek to improve knowledge and health outcomes. Through patient support and international medical mission trips, the organization shall seek to improve individual' health in developing nations.

What it reported doing in 2025

The adams, gladwell, durham foundation continues to work to improve the education of surgeons and proceduralists in medicine. Our work has focused on creating repeatable methods for improving the capture of and dissemination of surgical procedures, and training the next generation of practitioners.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.5%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1,031.37; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $300 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.