Ada Borup Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411953179
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
ADA, MN, USA
Phone
7018662675
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,181
Expenses
$55,093
Assets
$30,095

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eric Smart (President/Treas)
  • Jeremy Peterson (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Eric Smart (President/Treas)
  • Jeremy Peterson (Vice President)
  • Latonya Bitker (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through volunteer hours by club members and funds acquired by membership fees and fundraising activities it is our mission to promote and support activities sponsored by the Ada-Borup-West Public School District and the Communities it serves.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Ada Borup Booster Club provided financial assistance to the Ada-Borup/West Public Schools with the following approved requests:1-SPORTS PROGRAMS: Girls Basketball $528 Boys Basketball $272 Track $1,000 Scoreboard $3,250 Trap Team $500 Cheer $55 10,000 Shot Club $2,028 2-ELEMENTARY & HIGH SCHOOL: Elementary Field Trips $1,183 High School Field Trips $1,000 Classroom Supplies $1,424 ABW FCCLA $500 Technology $8,116 Special Ed Supplies/Eq $1713-MUSIC & THEATER: Ada Summer Children's Theater $500 4-OTHER ON-GOING PROJECTS: Prom $500 Senior Night Flowers $196 Concession Stand Equip $563 Color Run $575 Cougar Pride Prize $350 HOV Golf Course $1,500 Signage - Sports $893 Ada Girl Scouts $500 Ticket Booth/Picnic Shelter $23,808Total Approved Requests/Projects $49,412

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.5%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.5% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.