Active Cultures
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825384806
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9179165432
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $348,405
- Expenses
- $294,936
- Assets
- $111,295
- Liabilities
- $7,690
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH MCHALE (PRESIDENT)
- LAURA FRIED (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA FRIED (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $90,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Active cultures is a public arts nonprofit in los angeles that explores the intersection of art, food, and ecologies through artist-led projects and programs.
What it reported doing in 2025
Fiscal year 2025 was the first full year of implementing active cultures' fy2024-2027 strategic plan, a year devoted to grounding the organization's values in practice. Active cultures deepened its artist collaborations, expanded free public programming, and strengthened the organizational infrastructure required to sustain and grow its work. The organization onboarded its first full-time curator, nanette orly, extending curatorial and programmatic leadership beyond the executive director for the first time in the organization's history. Active cultures also stabilized full-time salaries for all staff, introduced health benefits, and established an operating reserve fund (benchmarks identified in the strategic plan as foundational to long-term sustainability). These organizational investments directly enabled an expanded slate of free and accessible public programs across los angeles.artist-led projectsactive cultures' core programming comprises multi-season artist collaborations developed through sustained dialogue, field research, and deep community engagement. In fy2025, the organization supported the following artist-led projects: o langit lupa (heaven and earth). Active cultures culminated this multi-season collaboration with artists ami lien and enzo camacho with the publication of reclaiming the land, a collection of conversations with agrarian reform leaders in negros, philippines, foregrounding the ongoing struggle for land justice.o colectivo amasijo: a circular offering. Produced in collaboration with the brick and artcenter, this performance and communal meal guided approximately 100 participants through collective engagement with ingredients foraged from the milpa and the hills of pasadena, culminating in an offering of endemic foods harvested by the artists during their agricultural journey in the yucatan.o fungal teachings / mycelial residency. A multiyear collaboration with artist yasmine ostendorf-rodriguez investigating ecologies of mutualism through research, fieldwork, and public gatherings. In fy2025, the project continued building mycelial networks among ecological art practitioners in los angeles and beyond.o summer solstice. Active cultures launched its inaugural annual summer solstice event at the audubon center at debs park: a seasonal convergence of sound, food, and land-based ritual featuring artists and chefs jihee kim, eva aguila, olive kimoto, living earth, and herb club la. The event established a new annual platform for seasonal public gathering rooted in ecological cycles.ongoing public programsunder curator nanette orly's leadership, active cultures launched two new ongoing public series in fy2025, alongside community-facing programs in response to immediate local need: o seeds: a film series. Launched at now instant, this new series opened with wild relatives by jumana manna, accompanied by a community conversation with nina raj of the altadena seed library exploring biodiversity and cultural preservation.o book club. A new bi-monthly reading series convened in parks and gardens across los angeles, exploring texts on the aesthetics of food, culinary resilience and kinship, alternative foodways, land rights and stewardship, and the intersection of agriculture and technology.o seed sorting night with altadena seed library. A hands-on volunteer workshop hosted by nina raj in which participants cleaned, sorted, and labeled seeds for seed banking and community distribution.o community produce drive at the hollywood farmers' market. A one-day collaboration with food forward, food access la, and chef minh phan to collect and distribute fresh market produce to communities affected by snap cuts.organizational accomplishmentsfy2025 marked significant progress toward the benchmarks established in active cultures' fy2024-2027 strategic plan: o staffing and compensation. Active cultures grew to a three-person, full-time leadership team--executive director laura fried, curator nanette orly, and director o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.4%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.4% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $203K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.