Activated Ministries Dba Donate a Car 2 Charity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330857142
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
7607391240
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,001,358
Expenses
$1,168,832
Assets
$1,928,999
Liabilities
$8,870

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS HACK (President, E.D.)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS HACK (President, E.D.): $111,000 total reported compensation
  • CASSANDRA D MOONEY (VP/Sec/Treas): $98,676 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Activated ministries primary goals include humanitarian and/or mission-based programs that benefit recipients in physical, emotional or spiritual ways serving people in need as an example of gods love and christian grace. We endeavor to help those in need through programs that effectively improve their standards of living, or directly provide education or scholarships, meet health care needs, or minister spiritually through inspirational materials.

What it reported doing in 2024

PROJECT GULU-FAMILY CARE, UGANDA: The Family Care Uganda (FCU) school and orphanage in Gulu, Uganda, was established in 2013. Since its founding, FCU students have consistently earned top grades in the non-municipal district. The majority of these children come from extremely challenging backgrounds. The Lords Resistance Army (LRA) severely affected the Gulu area, and a large percentage of the population are returnees from the LRA conflict. Many of the adults still suffer from PTSD, and the children have not always been raised in safe or nurturing environments. Most arrive at the school speaking little to no English, yet they consistently achieve excellent academic results and go on to succeed in secondary school.FCU has also welcomed students from the remote Ik community. Many of these children have since qualified as nurses, medical technicians, agriculturalists, and business professionals. We continue to receive new Ik children each year, thanks to the support of Honorable Lokwang Hilary, Member of Parliament, who funds transportation to bring the Ik pupils to Gulu for us to sponsor, educate, and care for.Additionally, FCU serves children from the South Sudanese Nuer refugee camps. Some of the Lost Boys who walked from Bor, through South Sudan during the war, and later settled in the West, appealed to us to help refugee youth here. Many of these South Sudanese pupils are older due to the complete lack of schooling during the war years. However, they have proven to be especially well-behaved, hardworking, and eager to succeed, now that they have been given this opportunity. GLORY MINISTRIES, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIAIn 2024, Activated Ministries began supporting and partnering with Glory Ministries in Andhra Pradesh, India, a multifaceted outreach dedicated to meeting the physical and spiritual needs of vulnerable communities. This program provides regular meals for hungry and orphaned children, educational and material support for children living in poverty, and care for widows and individuals living with disabilities, including those who are deaf or mute. Glory Ministries also extends compassion to those affected by leprosy and equips local pastors and leaders through mission training programs aimed at strengthening the church in rural villages. Through this partnership, we are helping bring hope and practical aid to some of Indias most underserved populations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 52
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.4%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 49.3%; rating input score 49
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.4% of revenue deployed · 49.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $576K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.