Action Impact Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232027319
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Elverson, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6102862102
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,269
- Expenses
- $90,772
- Assets
- $913,465
- Liabilities
- $66,687
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID PERSHALL JR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID PERSHALL JR (PRESIDENT)
- MARCIA C PERSHALL (SECRETARY)
- JEFFERY S HORROCKS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Spread gospel of jesus christ
What it reported doing in 2024
To reach jesus christ through activities (sports, bible studies, other activities), with leaders on weekends, weekly meetings, and mission trips. Emphasis on reaching young people.conduct weekly meetings on fridays during the school year and thursdays during the summer, where we average about 40 students. Meetings consists of a meal (summer only), swimming (summer only) and activities, along with a worship time when children are broken into three groups: jr. Action 3 -5th grades, impact 6-8 grades and action 9 - 12th. See additional information on schedule o.special events called outreaches are also conducted such as, fifty foot banana split night, anything goes night, olympic night, swimming, softball etc. We do day trips and a winter weekend. The purpose of these special events is to give an opportunity for kids to bring out their friends for a fun time, and to learn about god's love for them. We have a cove valley winter weekend, and each summer we do a conference or missions trip. This past summer our weeklong summer trip was to the ark and creation museum in Kentucky where we spent a week learning about apologetics and discipleship. Conduct 5th quarters at the twin valley high school home games where we dish out free ice cream in the high school cafeteria, have games, talk with the students and if the opportunity arises, we share how to know christ personally. On average about 150 people join us on these evenings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $585.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.06; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.