Action Group Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821973203
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Ellisville, MO, USA
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,602
Expenses
$20,509
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • PACK B WILLIMON (CHAIRMAN & P)
  • NANCY WILLIMON (SECRETARY/TR)
  • JORDAN TAPPIS (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Action group network, inc (agn) was formed for the purpose of building a more inclusive and democratic society through the fostering of civic engagement. Agn intends to provide support and training to individuals and organizations involved in grassroots organizing in order to enhance their skills and effectiveness as leaders and organizers, maintain a support network for individuals and organizations to turn to for information and assistance in conducting their organizing activities, and facilitate increased communication and collaboration among civic organizations and individuals which support similar causes in order to eliminate redundancy and increase effectiveness.

What it reported doing in 2021

Agn provides support and training to individuals and organizations involved in grassroots organizing in order to enhance their skills and effectiveness as leaders and organizers, maintain a support network for individuals and organizations to turn to for information and assistance in conducting their organizing activities, and facilitate increased communication and collaboration among civic organizations and individuals which support similar causes in order to eliminate redundancy and increase effectiveness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 11

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -93.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -25.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -45.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 11.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.