Acting Company Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680037694
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Yuba City, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5307511100
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $91,256
- Expenses
- $105,158
- Assets
- $337,116
- Liabilities
- $130,694
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Diane Lee Haas (President)
- Curt Schroeder (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Diane Lee Haas (President)
- Curt Schroeder (Vice President)
- Megan Shearer (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Acting Company's primary purpose as a non-profit community theater is to provide a platform for local residents to showcase their artistic, civic, and educational abilities and interests. We provide opportunities for actors, directors, designers, and crew members to hone their skills and contribute to the arts scene. We produce nine plays per year and offer educational acting classes for youth. We stage plays, musicals, and other performances that engage and captivate audiences. By offering diverse and accessible cultural experiences, we enrich the lives of our community. Both seasoned performers and aspiring artists are welcomed. Our community theater offers a stage for everyone.
What it reported doing in 2024
We produced six main stage productions and three series of youth drama classes and productions of which over 8,000 people in our local community attend. Over 200 community members assisted in the productions of musicals, youth programs, youth acting classes, classical plays, and original works. Our youth drama program benefited over 100 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.21; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.