Acres Homes Community Advocacy Group Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881898938
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7135043706
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $169,750
- Expenses
- $135,611
- Assets
- $109,289
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Latisha Grant (Chairman)
- Durrel Douglas (Treasurer)
- Chandra Sterling (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Acres Homes Community Advocacy Group aims to preserve and empower the community by educating residents, organizing for key health policy changes, and addressing the immediate needs of our community in Environmental Health and overall wellness. Our focus is to empower current and future residents in Acres Homes to ensure every neighbor is Healthy and Heard.
What it reported doing in 2025
Health Equity - The Acres Homes Community Advocacy Group is committed to promote health and wellness for all Acres Homes residents by engaging in ongoing dialogue about healthy behaviors and supporting various trainings and strategies. We also are committed to demystifying stigmas and myths around health topics, as well as promoting community resources and activities that directly impact cancer risk reduction.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35.6%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 44.6%; rating input score 45
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 51.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 35.6% of revenue deployed · 44.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.