Acp-nami Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811460824
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Wooster, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3302649597
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,000
- Expenses
- $25,889
- Assets
- $347,026
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- KEVIN BOWEN (ADMINISTRATO)
- MARK WOODS (BOARD MEMBER)
- MIKE HARWOOD (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To hold ownership deed to real property jointly acquired by anazao community partners and nami wayne holmes counties inc. Anazao community partners and nami wayne holmes counties inc. Are both nonprofit corporations recognized by the IRS under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue service code. Both organizations are community behavioral health service providers and are the sole shareholders of acp-nami inc. Acp-nami inc. Will collect monthly rent from the two partner shareholder agencies for the purpose of paying common expenses. These expenses will include, but may not be limited to, exterior building maintenance, structure and liability insurance, shared utilities, and grounds-keeping. At year end, following payment of property expenses, all remittances less expenses will be returned to the agencies that qualify under 501(c)(25) of the internal revenue code of 1986 (or the corresponding feature of any future united states internal revenue law.)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -115.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.4; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.