Achieving the Dream Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271635830
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Phone
- 2404500075
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,688,397
- Expenses
- $20,785,219
- Assets
- $46,294,483
- Liabilities
- $5,686,026
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREN A STOUT (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KAREN A STOUT (PRESIDENT & CEO): $695,836 total reported compensation
- SUSAN MAYER (CHIEF LEARNING OFFICER): $260,051 total reported compensation
- EMILY FROIMSON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $259,035 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To lead and support a national network of community colleges to achieve sustainable institutional transformation through sharing knowledge, innovative solutions and effective practices and policies leading to improved outcomes for all students.
What it reported doing in 2024
I. Network engagements -servicesachieving the dream (atd) is a partner and champion of more than 300 community colleges across the country. Drawing on our expert coaches, groundbreaking programs, and national peer network, we provide institutions with integrated, tailored support for every aspect of their work from foundational capacities such as leadership and data to intentional strategies for supporting students holistically, building k12 partnerships, and more. We call this whole college transformation. We know that with the right partner and the right approach, colleges can drive access, completion rates, and employment outcomes so that all students can access life-changing learning that propels them into community-changing careers.through application of atd's community vibrancy framework, atd supports colleges in expanding access to higher education, creating greater social and economic mobility for more learners and their families, and helps communities flourish across a broad range of measures. Work with colleges emphasizes a set of next generation metrics pertaining to access, early momentum, milestone momentum, mobility, and community vibrancy.a college will typically join the atd national network through a structured 3-year experience, foundations of transformation, in which it is supported by coaches to examine institutional data, assess core institutional capacities and develop strategies to redesign policies, practices and structures so that all students have accessible and relevant academic and social experiences. Throughout this three-year foundations of transformation experience and beyond, atd supports colleges in building their capacity to conduct continuous improvement. In fy25, atd brought in 15 new colleges into the network. Colleges who have completed their first three years move to accelerate their transformation by selecting more tailored supports in subsequent years. Colleges can delve into holistic student supports, k12 partnerships, or teaching and learning services, which come with more in-depth assessments, coaching and technical assistance. Atd also continued its work, with support from ascendium education group, coaching 28 tribal college and universities. These institutions have demonstrated significant progress in strengthening their data capacity and using evidence to improve outcomes. With continued support from an anonymous funder, atd has sustained and deepened its focus on high-impact practices by curating holistic student supports and teaching & learning seminars tailored to the tribal college and university context. Evidence-based institutional transformation requires colleges to understand their data. Through a bill & melinda gates foundation postsecondary data partnership initiative, we are supporting dozens of atd network colleges' transition to the post-secondary data partnership, allowing schools to capture more precise data points and access data from one portal. Learning events throughout the year serve an important role in furthering the transformational work at the colleges. These events include our marquee network-wide convening, dream, where more than 2300 community college leaders, practitioners, and funders gathered in person in philadelphia, Pennsylvania to work together and learn best practices and the annual data & analytics summit, attended by more than 400 practitioners, focused on improving student success outcomes by building capacity and developing a culture of inquiry across the institution. Dream and other highly focused peer-learning events allow atd to deepen its connection to network colleges, showcase effective practices, and draw in new colleges interested in engaging in institutional transformation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.2%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 66.1%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $34.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 63.7%; rating input score 64; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.23; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.2% of revenue deployed · 66.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $13.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $696K · 25 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.2M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.