Achievekids

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770412221
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Palo Alto, CA, USA
Phone
6504941200
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specialized Education Institutions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,259,081
Expenses
$11,847,799
Assets
$10,805,630
Liabilities
$2,811,547

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHY KRIESE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • STEPHEN CROOK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEPHEN CROOK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $209,267 total reported compensation
  • JULIE NGOV (DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCE): $163,929 total reported compensation
  • HAN-JUNG LEE (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $159,835 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and behavioral challenges. The primary mission of achievekids is to create a greater opportunity in the lives of students in special education through exceptional schools and collaborative educational services that enable students with special needs to thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

Special education: achievekids operates two non-public schools located in palo alto and east san jose. We serve over 100 elementary and secondary education students from four bay area counties. Achievekids provides dynamic and innovative education services for students in special education. Through a community of acceptance and respect, achievekids specializes in creating learning for students with severe emotional, learning, and/or developmental disabilities. Our dedicated teachers, paraprofessionals, behavioral health team, and speech therapists work collaboratively to create opportunity and independence in the lives of our students. This interdisciplinary team becomes a skillful problem solving group that instructs and guides students toward greater independence and self-reliance, enabling a path to a brighter future. Wasc accredited, achievekids is a learning organization, where all of our community learns and grows. Achievekids is a member of California association of private special education schools. For more information go to www.capses.com, or visit our website, www.achievekids.org.highly individualized and specialized programs: we use a multi-disciplinary collaborative approach, blending best practices from the fields of special education, behavioral health, speech and language, and vocational education to develop highly individualized curricula and teaching approaches. Our program is individualized to each student, and our approaches are focused on positive practices, skill development, enhancing communication, social-emotional learning, and community integration. We are a data-driven organization that makes curricular and instructional decisions based on data systems to help our students and community grow. Through this multi-faceted approach, the goal is to teach our students the skills necessary to return to find success beyond our doors. This can look different for different students, and includes returning to their public school or a less restrictive environment, or finding post-secondary options appropriate for that individual. Our goal is to create opportunity within the lives of our students, and help students find success in their communities.highly qualified staff: both schools are composed of experienced, highly qualified professionals from varying domains. Special education teachers, mental health therapists, speech and language pathologists, board certified behavior analysts, vocational and transition coordinators, and program counselors make up our professional staff and encompass our collaborative approach to helping meet the needs of our students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $209K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.