Achieve Human Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860354970
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Yuma, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 9283410335
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,528,308
- Expenses
- $8,527,371
- Assets
- $7,678,363
- Liabilities
- $453,897
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROL A CARR (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROL A CARR (PRESIDENT & CEO): $190,498 total reported compensation
- ADRIEL D SAUCEDA (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $134,296 total reported compensation
- ASHLEY HART (DIRECTOR): $18,143 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission statement: to empower the individuals we serve to live their lives to their greatest potential. Our vision statement: we lead in the development and delivery of innovative programs designed to strengthen individuals and build stronger communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Employment services: the organization currently contracts with the state of Arizona department of economic security; division for developmental disabilities and rehabilitation services administration in providing employment services for individuals with a disability. These include a variety of services such as group supported employment, individual supported employment, work adjustment training, job development and placement, supported employment, adult day training and transportation. Most of these services pay the individual for on-the-job training while other services focus on independent living skill development. The long-term goal of employment services is to prepare and train these individuals to obtain and maintain community integrated employment; build self-sufficiency and independence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 71
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $190K · 6 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.