Ace Volleyball Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813554277
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Wasilla, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9078415765
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,566
- Expenses
- $105,056
- Assets
- $69,353
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE REYNOLDS (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
- JAYME DeHART (DIRECTOR/VICE-PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
People named in this filing
- STEVE REYNOLDS (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
- JAYME DeHART (DIRECTOR/VICE-PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- KATELYN LAPAM (DIRECTOR/SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Youth amateur sports
What it reported doing in 2024
Ace Volleyballl Academy trained and taught volleyball skills to competitive-level athletes, ages 12-17.Ace taught approximately 50 girls the skills needed to compete in volleyball during the 2024-2025 season.Competition was based in Alaska only. (Regional)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $105K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.