Accent on Kids Endowment Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742750711
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022642654
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,419
- Expenses
- $81,756
- Assets
- $1,317,336
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY L ROACH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RMHC)
- STEPHEN BENSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GORDON HUNT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- NANCY L ROACH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RMHC): $142,483 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To raise, invest and manage funds through endowments and contributions for the sole purpose of financially supporting the activities, programs, practices and growth of ronald mcdonald house charities of phoenix, inc., successor to accent on kids, inc., and its primary activity, the ronald mcdonald house of phoenix, located in phoenix, Arizona.
What it reported doing in 2013
The organization manages and invests funds from endowment contributions and other contributions for the purpose of financally supporting the activities, programs, practices and growth of ronald mcdonald house charities of phoenix, inc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -152.2%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.11; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $82K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $142K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.