Accelerated Restoration Collaborative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932680181
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Tualatin, OR, USA
- Phone
- 2064088111
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Forest Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $199,794
- Expenses
- $183,351
- Assets
- $22,335
- Liabilities
- $1,079
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROWLAND GUITERREZ (President)
- STEPHEN FITCH (CEO)
People named in this filing
- ROWLAND GUITERREZ (President)
- DEBORA CRAWFORD (Trustee)
- STEPHEN FITCH (CEO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide economic opportunity for communities to be responsible stewards of the planet entrusted to all of our care
What it reported doing in 2024
Contracted with one NGO located in Chiapas, Mexico providing training and consultation through Acceleration Restoration Training (ART). Weekly training was provided to the NGOs 4 lead employees to expand their ability to provide impactful restoration of their local forests while working with the local people. Goals were set up to measure progress. As progress was made, meetings were scaled to monthly to monitor growth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 57.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 72.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 94.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $160K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.