Accelerate 500 Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824059664
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
9175496092
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,436,835
Expenses
$4,189,334
Assets
$5,228,978
Liabilities
$877,028

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • MELISSA BRADLEY (MANAGING PARTNER): $368,018 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Accelerate 500 inc. Is a business development program deesigned to bridge the gap between entrepreneurship and equity. Our programs seek to accelerate new majority entrepeneurs from high potential to high growth. Our vision is to create $100 billion of new wealth and economic power for and by the new majority. The firm provides several programs designed to support various stages in the lifecycle to include early-stage and growth-stage.

What it reported doing in 2024

1. Beyond 5- the beyond 5 campaign is designed to promote and support new majority businesses to increase the likelihood of business success beyond the typical failure rate of 5 years. The campaign is comprised of three strategies: i. National social media campaign in an effort to change the negative narrative around founders for color, we have initiated a social media campaign to promote new majority founders who have made it beyond 5. Our goal is to leverage our social media, and that of our partners, to promote the success stories of new majority entrepreneurs who have been running businesses beyond 5 years. We welcome any self-nominations or recommendations for entrepreneurs to promote in the campaign; email us at [email protected]. Survivability research reportthere is a dearth of primary research and in-depth analysis on what it takes a business to survive beyond 5 years. Our report will collect data from over 1,000 candidates and seek to provide insight on key inputs for surviving beyond 5 years. We will provide case studies, as well as outlines areas of opportunity for ecosystem builders, policy makers, investors, and the like to help advance these businesses beyond the "valleys of death".2. Pipeline program - the pipeline program was created to equip founders with the processes, mindsets and guidance to address these challenges and rapidly accelerate towards scale. The aim of the pipeline program is to work with business leaders to identify business goals and then develop an actionable plan to not only to help them achieve their goals, but to help their business become sustainable. By helping entrepreneurs build better businesses, pipeline enables companies to attract the talent, capital and connections needed forlast growth and development. The pipeline program is focused on helping entrepreneurs grow a successful business. The program's focus is beyond learning how to pitch and present. Instead, time is intentionally spent on supporting businesses on a path to maturity. Entrepreneurs completing the program will have a more investment-ready business and truly understand why and how to deploy future financings.3. Herimpact - herimpact is designed to help female social entrepreneurs scale their enterprises in order to increase their impact and long-term sustainability. The program was initiated in the fall of 2018. The initiative is comprised of an entrepreneurship summit, which is designed to build community and increase the capacity of female social entrepreneurs through advice from experts, online tools and networking. The initiative also includes a pitch competition, designed to invest in early and growth stage companies in the region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 53
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.6%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 32%; rating input score 32
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -71.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.6% of revenue deployed · 32% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $368K · 7 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.