Acam Educational Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201077473
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Bozeman, MT, USA
- Phone
- 8005323688
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52
- Assets
- $12,836
- Liabilities
- $1,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AHVIE HERSKOWITZ MD (President)
People named in this filing
- MITCHELL GHEN MD (Director)
- ALLEN GREEN MD (Treasurer)
- TADASHI MITSUO MD (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the nonprofit public benefit corporation law for public and charitable purposes. The organization shall be operated exclusively as a nonprofit corporation for charitable, educational, or scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code ("irc") of 1986 as amended. Specifically, the organization's purposes are to carry out, on a non-profit basis, the charitable, scientific, and educational purpose of the american college for advancement in medicine. ("acam"), a mutual benefit corporation exempt from federal income taxation under 501(c)(6) of the irc, or any successor organization of acam, by supporting the educational programs and charitable activities of acam.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization is a supporting organization for the american college for advancement in medicine, and secures the necessary funds for the organization to carry out its mission statement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 2
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -46.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.