Acadiana Native Plant Project Greaux Native
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813608678
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Sunset, LA, USA
- Phone
- 3375019261
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Garden Club, Horticultural Program
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,129
- Expenses
- $42,503
- Assets
- $89,875
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Heather Warner-Finley (President)
- Phyllis Baudoin-Griffard (Past-President)
- Ashlee Brackeen (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Heather Warner-Finley (President)
- Phyllis Baudoin-Griffard (Past-President)
- Ashlee Brackeen (Vice-President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promoting the use of native plants in our landscape
What it reported doing in 2024
We educate our members and general public about the use and benefits of native plants. This is accomplished by conducting workshops (3 in 2024, 49 participants), giving and hosting talks (about 6 in 2024; approximately 150 attendees), publishing a free monthly newsletter (approximately 2000 subscribers at end of 2024), and conducting outreach at various events (8 in 2024, approximately 600 people reached). We also facilitate the sale of books on regional native plants and collaborate with a local author on a regional book on native plant cultivation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.6%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.6% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.