Acadiana Area Central Office Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
720972129
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lafayette, LA, USA
Phone
3379910830
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,763
Expenses
$35,831
Assets
$13,351
Liabilities
$5,340

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES MALLIA (President)

People named in this filing

  • CHARLIE PRITCHETT (Chairman)
  • STEPHEN MORELLA (Treasurer)
  • JAMES MALLIA (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In solemn affirmation of the letter and the spirit of the twelve steps and twelve traditions and placing all our activities under the guidance of a higher power, the various and several groups of alcoholics anonymous in the acadiana area have met to form a central office to be of maximum service to the alcoholic who still suffers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Central office has maintained a central business office for alcoholics anonymous activities in the acadiana area, safeguarded the twelve traditions of aa as the group conscience dictates, supported local groups of aa, received and dispursed funds as necessary to meet the purposes and carry on the business of the central office, perormed any and all lawful acts deemed necessary by the central office steering committee on the conduct of its business and/or to meet its purposes, served and functioned as the communications center for the member groups with respect to matters of local area policy and interest, and conducted special events in accordance with and in the furtherance of these objectives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 46.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.