Academy of Physicians in Clinical Research
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562522267
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Schaumburg, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8475177225
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,809
- Expenses
- $191,600
- Assets
- $342,460
- Liabilities
- $92,009
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Raj Shah MD FAPCR (President)
- Monish A Sheth MD SFHM (Vice President)
- Leonard Weather Jr MD RPh (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Raj Shah MD FAPCR (President)
- Monish A Sheth MD SFHM (Vice President)
- Peter H Rheinstein MDJDMS (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
APCR is the not-for-profit organization dedicated to the excellence of investigators and pharmaceutical physicians. The Organization dedicated to both (1) preventing and curing disease and (2) protecting and enhancing the welfare of patients and study subjects through the acquisition, dissemination, and evaluation of knowledge concerning medicine and device development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide publications, knowledge sharing and other resources to members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.1%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 27.4%; rating input score 27
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 58.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.1% of revenue deployed · 27.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.