Academy of Biomimetic Dentistry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454182107
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8012669000
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,738
- Expenses
- $88,923
- Assets
- $11,261
- Liabilities
- $10,900
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAUL PRESSNER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SAUL PRESSNER (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL O'MALLEY (VP OF MEMBER)
- DIANNE CAPRIO (VP OF SCIENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote within contemporary destistry, the science and techniques of biomimetic dentistry, such that it is both accepted and embraced by patients, practitioners, educational institutions, governing bodies and insurance organizations as the fundamental standard in patient well being and care.
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of the academy of biomimetic dentistry is to promote the use of adhesive chemistry to return teeth to original strain harmony (strengh) and preserve pulp vitality. The academy of biomimetic dentistry believes that amputating tooth structure to achieve chemistry justifies 'adhesion' / 'bonding' as the preferred method of retention, not amputational mechanical retention.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.