Academic Medical Group Leadership Roundtable Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841151149
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Phone
- 4342686585
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,829
- Expenses
- $70,041
- Assets
- $41,954
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- EUGENE HONG (CHAIR)
- STEPHANIE SCHMIDT (VICE CHAIR)
- KYLE SHARP (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational forum
What it reported doing in 2024
Amglr is a member organization of medical group executives representing more than 18 leading academic health systems. Roundtable members share common goals, responsibilities, and interests, along with diverse organizational structures that include community-based infrastructures, all while unified by the mission and unique demands of the academic framework. Amglr members work to identify and frame incremental, achievable solutions that advance critical physician workforce issues faced by academic medical centers across these varied settings. The roundtable convenes bi-annually to provide a forum for members to share insights on the evolving roles and increasing complexity of physician teams. As peers with deep experience and knowledge, the collective intelligence of amglr members fosters innovative thinking and collaborative problem-solving, helping to accelerate the development of practical, forward-looking solutions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -35.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.