Academic Management Institute DBA Colorado Wyoming Network of Women Leader
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822316869
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Arvada, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038811627
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,441
- Expenses
- $71,415
- Assets
- $113,052
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- Lia Franklin (Consultant)
- Kristina Quynn (Co-Director)
- Kim Dale (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Colorado and Wyoming Network of Women Leaders (CWNWL) promotes the advancement of women in leadership roles in higher education through annual professional leadership development, high quality leadership training in higher education, and supportive networking and connections between and for higher education leaders. CWNWL's long history and programmatic success has achieved broad support from Colorado and Wyoming institutions of higher education. The Academic Management Institute (AMI) was organized by the CWNWL in 1986 as part of a charge from the American Council on Education (ACE) to increase the number of women who served as college and university presidents and to foster and encourage women's leadership development among institutions of higher education in the states of Colorado and Wyoming.
What it reported doing in 2024
Academic Management Institute is comprised of four conference-style sessions throughout the academic year, specifically; October, November, January, and March. Each session includes 3-5 guest presenters, that are local to the Colorado/Wyoming region, and speak to a session's theme and from their expertise in higher education. Sessions are organized around a broad topic and between presentations and interactive activities are intended to build skills and a network for women professionals in higher education in the twenty-first century. Institute participants must be nominated and sponsored by their home institutions. Participants must be able to attend all 4 conference-style sessions of the institute. Each year's cohort is comprised of 40-50 participants. Over the year, participants complete a project of their own design that contributes to their home college or university.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.4%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.