Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562298880
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Lake Oswego, OR, USA
- Phone
- 2692649261
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,458,964
- Expenses
- $1,987,648
- Assets
- $1,250,499
- Liabilities
- $536,161
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMANTHA SIMMONS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SAMANTHA SIMMONS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $239,647 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the consortium is to advance the principles and practices of integrative healthcare within academic health centers and health systems.
What it reported doing in 2023
Membership services - as an organization we are committed to sharing information and ideas, meeting challenges together in a process grounded in the values of integrative medicine supporting member institutions and providing a national voice for integrative medicine. Our membership currently includes approximately 80 highly esteemed academic health centers and health systems. Providing online services for dues payments, conference registrations, relevant information sharing, program updates and announcements, voting platforms, awards, materials access, online presence for public access, and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $240K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $152K reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.