Academic Collaborative for Integrative Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262073127
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Seatle, WA, USA
Phone
8582409033
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,354
Expenses
$96,100
Assets
$39,731

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOANN YANEZ (CHAIRMAN)
  • DALE HEALY (VICE CHAIRMA)
  • STEFFANY MOONAZ (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the health of individuals and communities by creating and sustaining a network of global educational organizations and agencies which will promote mutual understanding, collaborative activities and interdisciplinary health care education

What it reported doing in 2020

1.national academies of medicine's global forum on innovation in health professional education - as a sponsoring member organization of the nam global forum, acih has been involved in the annual and quarterly work of this group which is acih mission focused in interprofessional care, practice and education. Acih has two representatives that are members of the board that represent our membership to the nam global forum, (board members liza goldblatt and david o'bryon.) the opportunity to educate fellow member organizations representing 19 health professions across the globe advances our mission focused on interprofessional education in complementary, integrative health. The vehicle to educate is through engagement in the member meetings (two meetings annually) as well as through the educational workshops (two annually.) acih has played a leading role in the workshop planning as well as ongoing communication between workshops.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.1%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 91.4%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.1% of revenue deployed · 91.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $88K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.