Abrahamic Alliance International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264704170
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2009
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4087288943
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Centers
Affiliation
Interfaith

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,819
Expenses
$113,577
Assets
$149,749
Liabilities
$785

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • RODNEY CARDOZA (EXEC DIR; BD CHAIR)
  • AGHA BILAL (TREASURER)
  • IRIS BENDAHAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Inter-religious peace building

What it reported doing in 2025

Aai compassion: aai united more than 1,630 jews, christians, and muslims in the san francisco bay area to serve poor, suffering, and unhoused neighbors by:(1) preparing and distributing more than of 30,500 pounds of food to unhoused, poor and hungry neighbors suffering food insecurity;(2) running blood drives in partnership with american red cross to save more than 759 lives(3) partnering with habitat for humanity to construct 4 housing units to shelter unhoused families;(4) providing and repaired over 140 bicycles for unhoused persons in need of transportation for transformation;(5) assembling and delivering over 700 hygiene kits to help keep unhoused neighbors safe, clean and healthy.see photo essays of compassion at https://events.abrahamicalliance.org

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.4%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 61.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.4% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $101K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.