Abled

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851227270
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Orangevale, CA, USA
Phone
916-790-8020
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$438,776
Expenses
$427,216
Assets
$153,065
Liabilities
$109,023

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kara Green (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Kara Green (Executive Director): $109,010 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

ABLED provides hands-on job training, independent living skills, and social-emotional support so adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities can achieve competitive integrated employment and greater independence.

What it reported doing in 2025

ABLED's Job Training Activity Center is a structured, full-day vocational training program serving adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) who are referred through Alta California Regional Center. The program operates Monday through Friday and is designed to prepare participants for competitive integrated employment through individualized, person-centered instruction aligned with each participant's Individual Service Plan (ISP) and Individual Program Plan (IPP) objectives. The program provides hands-on training across more than 30 entry-level jobs, including custodial, retail, food service, clerical, and stocking/warehouse positions. Instruction is differentiated to meet each participant's readiness level and is delivered through two complementary components: (1) a structured Curriculum covering financial literacy, technology skills, and independent work tasks curated to individual goals; and (2) a Practicum component providing real-world job skill application assessed through standardized checklists and rubrics. In Fiscal Year 2025, ABLED expanded its programming to include volunteer activity experiences, providing participants with additional community integration opportunities and applied skill development in real-world settings. Participants who are nearing program completion may participate in a paid internship program, which provides up to 1,040 hours of compensated work experience across a variety of community employers who are supportive of individuals with IDD pursuing competitive integrated employment. The anticipated duration of program participation is approximately 24 months, with length of service determined by individual need, progress, and person-centered planning. In Fiscal Year 2025, ABLED served 42 individuals and tracked progress toward 240 ISP objectives. Key program outcomes included: Work Readiness: Program attendance averaged 85.6%, exceeding the program benchmark of 80%. Curriculum assessments (measuring independence, engagement, task completion, and accuracy) averaged 78.9%. Level 1 Practicum participants (assessed on punctuality, job checklist adherence, workplace behavior, and organization) averaged 81.4% overall proficiency. Level 2 Practicum participants (assessed on independence, initiative, accuracy, focus, and communication) averaged 77.3% overall proficiency. Independence: 95% of participants (40 of 42) demonstrated reduced reliance on staff prompts in at least one core job skill area, exceeding the program goal of 70%. 74% of participants (31 of 42) independently completed assigned job tasks with minimal verbal prompting, exceeding the program goal of 50%. ISP Progress: 79.6% of participants (33 of 42) made measurable, documented progress toward their ISP objectives, exceeding the program benchmark of 75%. Of 240 total ISP objectives tracked, 17.5% were fully achieved and 79.6% showed measurable progress. Transition Outcomes: Four participants successfully transitioned from the program during Fiscal Year 2025: one to competitive integrated employment (representing 33% of participants who reached 24 months of enrollment), one to an additional competitive integrated employment placement, one to a paid internship placement, and one to competitive vocational training.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 70% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.9%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 95.5%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 88.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 92.9% of revenue deployed · 95.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $408K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $109K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.