Abington Parent Teacher Organization C/o Corissa Morales
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352367676
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Abington, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6178934400
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $108,965
- Expenses
- $66,107
- Assets
- $174,541
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN HARRIS (CHAIRPERSON/PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUSAN HARRIS (CHAIRPERSON/PRESIDENT)
- CAROLYN RUSSO (SECRETARY)
- CORISSA MORALES (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The abington parent teachers organization exists exclusively for the educational and charitable purposes of the abington students. As a meeting ground for parents, teachers, and administrators of the abington public schools. The parent teachers organization intends to do the following: i)to foster communications between parents and school personnel. Ii)to bring together the abington community, keeping it involved and interested in its public schools. Iii)to sponsor fund raising activities for items not normally appropriated in the school budget. Iv)to cooperate with school administration to improve school programs and services.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization sponsors various fund raiding activities such as book fairs, candle sales, cookie sales, kids stuff coupon books, bake sales, sponsor dances and vaious other fund raising activities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.64; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.