Abilene Home Away from Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822114371
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-PF 2022
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,707
Expenses
$12,923
Assets
$15,645

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dawn Ripple (Executive Director -Jun through Dec)
  • Judy Farmer (Executive Director -Jan through May)
  • Kevin Ripple (President of the Board of Directors)
  • KImberley Cole (Vice President of the Board of Directors)

People named in this filing

  • Dawn Ripple (Executive Director -Jun through Dec)
  • Judy Farmer (Executive Director -Jan through May)
  • Kevin Ripple (President of the Board of Directors)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide Support for First-Term Enlisted at-risk Military Personnel stationed at Dyess Air Force Base. Support is provided by coordinating local host families to provide support for Airmen. The Abilene Home Away From Home program coordinates the placements and provides communion and support for them and the families that support them. We had two large program-wide events to support the program.

What it reported doing in 2025

Adopt an Airman program at Dyess Air Force Base. We provide host community family support for our first term Airmen that are in the program by coordinating the placement of Airmen with families and holding special events for the families and Airmen throughout the year. AHAFH hosted two events in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 55.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -28.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.