Aberdeen Central Athletic Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460398191
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2009
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Aberdeen, SD, USA
Phone
6057257118
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,266
Expenses
$100,126
Assets
$40,567

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the boosters shall be to form a support group for Aberdeen Public School athletic teams. The boosters will assist in the promotion of athletics, encourage communication between coaches, parents, and students, encourage parent attendance, and assist in promoting an athletic department philosophy. They will assist schools with the support of the athletic programs through various activities that either generate revenue or reduce expenses for the athletic programs.

What it reported doing in 2009

Financially assist the various athletic programs as well as summer league activities, such as, boys and girls basketball and volleyball camps.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -29.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $94K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.