Abccm Doctors' Medical Clinic Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561987021
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Arden, NC, USA
Phone
8282595300
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,294,211
Expenses
$4,908,839
Assets
$2,727,468
Liabilities
$115,469

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DR WILLIAM KEITH CAMPBELL (CHAIR)
  • ROBIN BORZOTTA RN (DIRECTOR)
  • DR FELIX SARUBBI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Abccm doctor's medical clinic, inc (the "clinic")is a nonprofit entity whose sole memeber is asheville-buncombe community christian ministry, inc ("abccm"). The clinic provides access to health care including medical, emergency dental, and pharmacy for the uninsured of buncombe county and is a primary care home for those below 250% of the federal poverty level with no insurance. The clinic is the trusted access point of entry for any low income and uninsured person in buncombe county to receive high quality clinic care, medications, and referral to community resources in order to bridge them to a primary care home. The clinic walks along with each person to navigate the complex system until ongoing care is secured, and the individual and community gap is closed. The clinic is funded primarily through memeber support, donor contributions and grants.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided healthcare access through medical and pharmacy services for uninsured residents, primarily of buncombe county, below 250% of the federal poverty level and medication assistance for those underserved or 'in the doughnut hole.' we provided assistance to 2,943 patients, with 27,188 contacts and 3,141 referrals for labs, radiology, and specialty care. We filled 14,220 prescriptions worth 2,770,753 to support treatment plans. Patients receive primary care and are connected to the area's four community clinics. Most patients had a job - two out of three were employed with no health insurance. We distributed over 2,200 medical equipment items. We offered internships and residency training to 127 students through partnerships with 9 area universities, colleges, and mahec.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.