Abcap Housing Iii Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311267721
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Georgetown, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9373786041
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Temporary Housing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,908
- Expenses
- $184,273
- Assets
- $1,153,384
- Liabilities
- $1,192,413
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL WICKERHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL WICKERHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $162,429 total reported compensation
- NANCY DARBY (SECRETARY): $103,234 total reported compensation
- BRITTANY BRIERLY (TRUSTEE): $82,418 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide facilities & services designed to meet the physical, social and psychological needs for elderly & handicapped individuals.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provides affordable housing for the elderly and handicapped in adams county, Ohio.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 47
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -39.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.26; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.03; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 63.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $150K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $162K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.