Abc Pregnancy Care Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920113488
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Kenai, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9072839062
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $376,810
- Expenses
- $328,151
- Assets
- $1,085,520
- Liabilities
- $6,571
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- REBECCA PETERS (EXECUTIVE DI): $60,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Abc pregnancy care center is a christ-centered organization dedicated to providing accurate information, services and support to facilitate informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual integrity, parenting and post-abortive recovery. Abc pcc is a non- profit that provides help to individuals regardless of marital status, age, race or religion.
What it reported doing in 2025
Abc life choices continues to serve the kenai peninsula providing a safe and confidential place for women and men to demonstrate the value and worth of every life. The no-cost medical services for pregnancy and sexual health include pregnancy options information, lab-quality pregnancy tests & pregnancy verifications, limited ob ultrasounds, sti information, testing & treatment, abortion information and risks, adoption information, abortion pill reversal and medical referrals. Accredited by cola as a moderately complex lab, abc life choices strives for excellence in all we do and provided 165 pregnancy tests, 172 limited ob ultrasounds and 93 sti tests this year. Abc life choices also equips individuals and families through life-affirming pregnancy, parenting & life skills classes through our no cost earn while you learn (ewyl) program where 348 clients picked up tools to thrive and not just survive both as individuals and as parents through peer mentoring and coaching classes. Additionally, abc life choices helps to empower those dealing with grief and loss because of sexual trauma, abortion and miscarriage to find healing and hope in these one-on-one or small group mentoring classes. Of the 1,378 appointments that were offered, 92% of clients who completed a written exit survey indicated their overall experience at the center was positive. Additionally, through this ewyl program, clients went home with much needed material resources at no cost to themselves including diapers, baby wipes, formula, baby & maternity clothing, new car seats, strollers and so much more. Because of our services and support, every person who came through the doors of abc life choices experienced in tangible ways that they had great value, worth and dignity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $58.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $304K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.