ABC Teton Valley
Legal name: Abc Above and Beyond the Classroom in Teton Valley Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831954130
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Driggs, ID, United States
- Phone
- (208) 244-0625
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $366,409
- Expenses
- $338,194
- Assets
- $413,256
- Liabilities
- $155
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KAMI ARCHIBALD (EXECUTIVE DI): $55,225 total reported compensation
- ANNA WELLS (EXECUTIVE DI): $13,949 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
ABC provides academic, enrichment, and wellness programs for at-risk children in a safe, supportive environment through its summer and afterschool programs. With a deep passion for ABC’s mission to provide high-quality, accessible out-of-school programs, Hannah brings over a decade of nonprofit experience, including two years serving on the ABC Board of Directors. Hannah’s background includes roles as Development Director at both Teton Science Schools and Friends of the Teton River. She has also taught various age groups in classrooms and outdoor settings across Jackson and Teton Valley. Hannah holds a BA from Middlebury College and an MBA from Green Mountain College. She lives in Driggs with her husband, two children, a dog, a cat, and twelve chickens. When she’s not working, she’s outside with her family—floating, biking, skiing, sledding - ru.
What it reported doing in 2024
Abc provides academic, enrichment, and wellness programs for at-risk children in a safe and supportive environment. We accomplish this through summer, fifth day, and afterschool programs. The summer school program benefitted 110 children and the afterschool program benefitted 157 children. Due to no fault of their own, today's children face threats to their stability and well-being. Child care is becoming increasingly unaffordable, leaving working families with tough choices during out-of-school hours. As a result, children might be left home alone after school or during the summer months. Their safety is at risk. Abc provides a safe and supportive environment for those children who need help the most. Abc accomplishes this by providing affordable summer, fifth day, and afterschool programs, thus reducing barriers for children to participate. At abc, children are safe and supported, giving them the foundation they need to learn, grow, and thrive.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $288K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.