AAUW Roseville-South Placer
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462101647
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Lincoln, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9164347309
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,380
- Expenses
- $33,401
- Assets
- $37,741
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- Michelle Colletto (Pres Elect)
- Sandy Haley (Co Pres)
- Leslie McNeill (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance gender equity, through advocacy, education, philanthropy and education. The organization provides community programs and opportunities through its philanthropic endeavors, to fund scholarships for middle school, high school and 2-year college students.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grants and donations1) AAUW RSP member donated $5,000 for Tech Trek STEAM camp at UC Davis.2) A grant of $700 was received for Bingo fundraiser expenses.3) Members donated more $2,666 to the Branch4) An outside donor contributed $5,000 for Speech Trek awards and expenses.5) Received an $800 grant for Speech Trek expenses6) $750 was donated for Sierra College scholarships.7) High School scholarships received $1,100 in donations.8) $500 was contributed by an AAUW RSP member for website development.Programs1) The AAUW RSP Sierra College Scholarship recipients spoke on their educational journeys, and the AAUW Trek Camp campers shared their hands on STEAM experiences.2) The League of Women Voters presented information on the November ballot propositions and answered questions from the audience.3) Financial planning representatives discussed women's financial empowerment topics including how to increase retirement savings, the stock market and charitable giving.4) Members of the Lincoln Fire Department presented a seminar on Wildlife Preparedness, including how the city is enhancing readiness, home hardening tips and creating defensible space.5) Writer Christina Richter spoke on "Placer County Past and Present and led a discussion on the area's history and present-day Placer County.6) In celebration of Women's History Month Karen McNeill, PhD presented on the topic of "Julia Morgan on Campus: Women and Higher Education in the Life and Career of California's Trailblazing Architect".Community Outreach1) Organized a Basics Needs donation drive for students at Sierra College.2) Worked with personnel from local middle schools to identify candidates to attend a weeklong STEAM camp at UC Davis campus.3) Held a free to the public speech contest open to students from local high schools.4) Offered free programs open to the public on the November election, financial planning, wildfire preparation, local history, and women's history.Philanthropy1) Three scholarships in the amount of $2,500 per student were awarded to re-entry women students at Sierra College for a total of $7,500.2) Five local high school students were awarded a total of $3,000 for Speech Trek.3) Six local high school students received $1,000 scholarships for a total of $6,000.4) Six local middle school students were chosen to attend the STEAM Tech Trek camp at UC Davis campus for a total of $6,000.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.8% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.