Aashka Company
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820658431
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Hyde Park, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6176692909
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,190
- Expenses
- $46,381
- Assets
- $64,546
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MAYOLINA SEGUY (PRESIDENT)
- LUCIE DANIEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MAYOLINA SEGUY (PRESIDENT)
- LAVINIA IFRIM (TREASURER)
- LUCIE DANIEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Aashka dance company provides children with a safe nuturing environment to express themselves through the art of dance. The students learn a variety of dances such as hip-hop, krump, bachata, salsa, cha-cha, merengue, ballet, contemporary, jazz, and african bantaba. Aashka dance company has paid employees and volunteers that serve as instructors for the children in the organizations studio in hyde park, Massachusetts. All of the organizations time and expenses are spent conducting the activity. The activity is funded through individual donations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth tutors were hired to tutor over 20 kids in the boston area with the help of thesuccesslink program and taught dance to 25 students at our dance studio.in addition there was a backpack drive for the students to prepare them for the school year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.3%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 12.9%; rating input score 13
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.8%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.3% of revenue deployed · 12.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.